Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Newport Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1918No. Docket No. 50Published

Error to Gogebic; Shepherd, J., presiding. Case by Charles Anderson, an infant, by his next friend, against the Newport Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. Plaintiff brings error.

1DissentOstrander, C. J.

Assuming that plaintiff was not a trespasser in using the traveled path across defendant’s premises, was licensed to do that, he went aside, out of the way, to examine, and then to appropriate, some of defendant’s personal property. Having appropriated and carried away this property, in another place, not on defendant’s premises, and after some lapse of time, he was injured in attempting to convert it to some personal use. It is alleged in the declaration of the plaintiff that because children, including plaintiff, did use the said way and , had for a long time done so, and because they were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Morrison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Peninsular Trust Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Watson v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Peklenk v. Isle Royale Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API