Commonwealth v. DeSimone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Jones:
Although I was able to concur in the result in Com. v. Anderson, 441 Pa. 483, 272 A. 2d 877 (1971), I am unwilling to grant retroactive application to that opinion.' It is my view that the majority ignores the practical effect of its decision.
The decision to grant retrospective effect to new constitutional rules is a function of three variables: “(a) the purpose to be served by the new standards, (b) the extent of reliance by law enforcement authorities on the old standards, and (c) the effect on the administration of justice of a retroactive…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.