Legal Opinion

Fall River Etc. Dist. v. Shasta Etc. Dist.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1930No. Docket No. 3871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant in the sum of $8,213.84, together with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent from the date of entry of judgment, in an action for money had and received by the defendant for the uses and purposes of the plaintiff, based upon allegations that the defendant had collected and had the use and benefit of certain moneys raised by taxation which should have been had, obtained and enjoyed by the plaintiff. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

After alleging the existence of the two High School Districts named in the title to this action,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Center School Township v. State ex rel. Board of School CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Walser v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Arthur v. Polk Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. School City v. Harrison School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. School Directors of District No. 153 v. School Directors of District No. 154Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Laramie County School District No. OneWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Salisbury R-IV School District v. Westran R-I School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs v. Laramie Sch. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pleasant View Reorganized School District No. 1 v. Springfield Reorganized School District No. 12Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. School District No. 8 v. School District No. 15Nebraska Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API