United States v. Stevenson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
The pertinent facts in this appeal are ■similar to those in United States of America v. Lindholm et al. (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 784, this day decided. The only difference worthy of mention is that instead of failing to file affidavits opposing plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the appellant in the present case submitted defensive affidavits which were deemed insufficient.
For the reasons given in _the opinion in the former case, the judgment herein is reversed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. LindholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aguirre v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Portland Trust & Savings Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1938