Arthur A. Williams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal from a conviction for robbery presents a due process issue deriving from a pretrial identification in 1966. 1 Since the trial occurred prior to the decision in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), that issue as such was not raised in the trial court. There was, however, extensive testimony relating to the conditions under which the eyewitnesses observed the perpetration of the crime, and to the intervening events prior to the in-court identifications made by both such witnesses. The facts with respect to police-station identification efforts were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Malcus T. Clemons v. United States of America, David E. Clark v. United States of America, Alvin C. Hines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. James O. Gambrill, United States of America v. Jerry L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States of America Ex Rel. Robert Harris v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Wise v. MurphyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States v. Edgar L. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Matthews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.