Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex Parte Goldsen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 11, 2000No. 1991512Published

1Concurrence

I concur in the holding of the main opinion that the defendant Goldsen is entitled to a set-off against the compensatory damages awarded by the trial court ($76,898.39) in the amount paid by Herbstreith ($20,000) in settlement of Simpson's potential claim(s) against him arising out of the automobile accident. To require Goldsen to pay the entire $76,898.39 would result in Simpson's receiving a windfall above the actual amount she was entitled to receive as compensation for her loss.

This result is consistent with the well-established rule of Alabama law "that a person injured by joint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. KempSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Von HadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Goldsen v. SimpsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API