Legal Opinion

Stevens v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1925No. A-5387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

From a conviction in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa, upon an information charging the sale of intoxicating liquor, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.

The only assignment of error argued is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. The evidence in brief is: Two officers went to the house of one Williams, and by arrangement Williams called the defendant by telephone. Defendant then came to the porch of the house and Williams there ordered two quarts of whisky. The defendant went away and returned in a short time, went into the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. City of Iola v. LedererSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maladin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Littke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API