Legal Opinion
Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 18, 1993No. 92-1236, 92-1237 and 92-1256Published
1Opinion of the Court
5 F.3d 1557
28 U.S.P.Q.2d 1081, 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 305
Robert L. MENDENHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
CMI Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CEDARAPIDS, INC., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 92-1236, 92-1237 and 92-1256.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Sept. 13, 1993.
Rehearing Declined; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc
Declined Nov. 18, 1993.
Jerry J. Dunlap, Dunlap, Codding & Lee, P.C., of Oklahoma City, OK, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Richard S. Florsheim, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was George E. Quillin.
Donald H. Zarley,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.