Legal Opinion

Town of Cordova v. Village of Le Sueur Center

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1898No. Nos. 11,375—(130)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Upon Application for Reargument. December 23,1898. Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Le Sueur county, Cadwell, J., granting judgment to defendant notwithstanding a verdict for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The plaintiff herein, the town of Cordova, brought this action against the defendant village of Le Sueur Center to recover $427.68, with interest, for the care and board of two paupers whose legal residence was in the said village. The plaintiff, within whose limits the paupers were found, returned them to the said village, the latter refused to receive or care for them, and the plaintiff did so.

The plaintiff and defendant are municipal corporations situated in the county of Le Sueur, in this state. The village is situated in the town of Lexington, in said county, and was incorporated…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Albion v. Village of Maple LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Town of QueenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Towel of Aroma Park v. Town of PapineauAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API