Legal Opinion
Brooke Clendenen v. United States of America, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 2, 2026No. 2:25-cv-03655Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BROOKE CLENDENEN, Case No. 2:25-cv-3655-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Brooke Clendenen brings this Federal Torts Claims Act (“FTCA”) action against 19 United States of America and Vista Recreation. Pending before the court are defendants’ motions 20 to dismiss, ECF Nos. 12 & 15, and plaintiff’s motion to stay adjudication of the motions to 21 dismiss, ECF No. 26. For the reasons stated below, the motions to dismiss are granted, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Carcieri v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.