Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Vickery

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Circuit Court of Clay county; the Hon. William C. Jones, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakeb

To the March term, 1890, of the circuit court of Clay county, J. M. and J. B. Tanner filed their bill in chancery against E. D. Vickery, and Kate Vickery, his wife, to foreclose a mortgage on the south-west quarter of the south-east quarter of section 12, township 4, north, range 7, east of the third principal meridian, alleged to have been executed by said Vickery and wife on the 12th day of March, 1888, to secure the payment of a promissory note of that date for $225. Joe PL Dawson and Joe Britton, plaintiffs in error, were also made defendants, with the allegation that they claimed some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago Artesian Well Co. v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Robins v. SwainIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spalding v. St. Joseph's Industrial SchoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Gamble v. HanchettNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Nelson v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Powell v. SampsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API