Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Manufacturers' Finance Acceptance Corp.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1933No. 6 Div. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal in this case is on the record, there being no bill of exceptions, which fact eliminates from consideration questions involving given and refused written charges and excerpts from the court's oral charge dependent upon any phase of the evidence. Johnston Bros. Co. v. Washburn, 16 Ala. App. 311,77 So. 461; 2 Vol. Alabama Southern Digest, 928 (3).

The suit was in detinue claiming one Nash automobile and was originally brought against defendant Cora Thompson, who executed a replevin bond for the property sued for, on October 7, 1929. On September 11, 1930, by leave of the court first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. Stewart Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Tabor v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. German-American National Bank v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Hooper v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young & Vann Supply Co. v. Crenshaw CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Thompson v. Manufacturer's Finance Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API