Legal Opinion

Zornow v. Prudential Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

Ón the appeal from the judgment in this case we affirmed without opinion. (210 App. Div. 813.) Counsel for appellant urges that we have overlooked important facts in the record and have failed to recognize established legal principles which he claims are decisive in favor of his client. We, therefore, deem it proper to state formally the views we entertain.

The judgment in respondent’s favor on the trial justifies a statement of the facts established by the evidence as follows: Ernest Zimmer, aged about forty-eight years, died August 3, 1921, at a hospital in Rochester. For some time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Wokal v. BelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Ruoff v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of O'NeillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. Dorsey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Sylvester v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Brown v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. Jones' Administrator v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API