Legal Opinion

People v. Fehrenbach

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1894No. 21019PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court" of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

The defendant, George Fehrenbach, was informed against with one R. E. McBurnie, for the crime of grand larceny charged to have been committed on the *3961st of December, 1892, at the city and county of San Francisco, by feloniously stealing the sum of one hundred dollars in lawful money of the United States, the personal property of one Earl L. Cooky

Upon a trial defendant was convicted and adjudged to punishment by confinement for eight years in the state prison. The appeal is from the judgment, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

■ Defendant kept what was denominated as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. People v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. O'NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API