Legal Opinion

Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 10, 1954No. C. D. 1621PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of an additional duty of 10 per centum ad valorem under section 304 (c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, on tanned sheepskins, imported from Argentina, on the ground that they were not legally marked.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act, as amended, are as follows:

SEC. 304. MARKING OF IMPORTED ARTICLES AND CONTAINERS.(a) Marking of Articles. — Except as hereinafter provided, every article of foreign origin (or its container, as provided in subsection (b) hereof) imported into the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Burtonizing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Hudson Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Corral v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. New York Bolting Cloth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  5. Protest 883902-G of Ocean Leather Corp.United States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. U.S. Wolfson Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API