Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 20, 1927No. 11,667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Maeion E. Brooks, plaintiff below, had a verdict and judgment against Vivian Bradbury, for $23,000 compensatory, and $2,000 exemplary damages for the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s husband, Howard A. Brooks. The defendant brings error.

The main force of defendant’s argument here is in support of the claim that the verdict is unsupported by the evidence, but the evidence for plaintiff, if believed, was quite sufficient, while that of defendant contained nothing which, - even if believed, was conclusive in her. favor except her own denials. If the evidence here were as conclusive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. McAllister v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Sullivan v. ValiquetteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Cohen v. FoxColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. McNelis v. BruceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Tice v. MandelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kiger v. MeehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  5. Hallack & Howard Lumber Co. v. BaglySupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API