Legal Opinion
Wenning v. Calhoun
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 2005No. 69A05-0401-CV-54PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
KIRSCH, Chief Judge.
Frank Wenning and Lottie Calhoun both petition for rehearing from our decision in which we ordered the parties' contract rescinded, raising various arguments. On further consideration, we grant rehearing.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
We set out the following facts in our original opinion:
"Wenning owned acreage in Ripley County, Indiana. In 2001, he fell behind on his mortgage payments and needed to raise cash. In December, he entered into an oral agreement to sell three acres to Calhoun, the wife of his nephew, for $9,000.00, which she was to pay the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wolvos v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Kokomo Veterans, Inc. v. SchickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Berkel & Co. Contractors, Inc. v. Palm & Assoc., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Tastee-Freez Leasing Corp. v. MilwidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conwell v. Gray Loon Outdoor Marketing Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Zukerman v. MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Larry J. Jernas and R & R Horse Haven, Inc. v. Kevin J. GumzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Koehlinger v. State Lottery Commission of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Elliott v. Rush Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.