Levi v. Darling

— This was an action by the appellant against;, the appellee, for the possession of a stock of groceries, alleged to be worth $14,000. The complaint, affidavit and" undertaking are in the usual form..

Answer, 1. The general denial. 2. Property in Simon Oberdorfer and Ben. Koltinsky. 3. Property in the same *498parties, and that Collyer and Hodgson had before that time sued-out an attachment against the property of Oberdorfer and Koltinsky, and the defendant, being the sheriff of Vanderburgh county, had seized the goods mentioned in the complaint, under the attachment, and held them by virtue…