Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 10, 1986No. 147-86CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*692OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (hereafter, motion to dismiss). In addition, in her response, plaintiff has asked that if the action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, it be transferred to a district court. Because the court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over the matters complained of, the motion to dismiss is granted. The court also finds that the test of 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (1982) for transfer has not been met.

I. FACTS

Plaintiff was employed as a Distribution Clerk, PS-6, by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Bernard Bell v. Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. James Abernathy v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Dancy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Reilly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Cavin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API