Legal Opinion
Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Daniel Russell Boiler Works, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 2, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation engaged in writing surety bonds, credit and other insurance, executed a bond as surety, pursuant to an application therefor signed by Thomas Berry and Edward F. Wallace, copartners doing business as the Hanover Sales Company (hereinafter called the Sales Company), Ernest W. Norton, Commonwealth Pipe and Supply Company and the defendant, all of whom were also named in the bond as principals. This bond was given to the A. F. Cochrane Company (hereinafter called the Cochrane Company), and was conditioned upon the performance by the Sales Company of all the terms of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Monument National Bank v. Globe WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Nowel v. Equitable Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Teele v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Broadway National Bank v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Surety Co. of New York v. 14 Canal Street, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- New Hampshire National Bank v. Garage & Factory Equipment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Treasurer & Receiver General v. Macdale Warehouse Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Pilgrim Real Estate, Inc. v. Superintendent of PoliceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Gardiner Trust Co. v. Augusta Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.