Legal Opinion

Felipe v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 12, 2016No. 75232-4-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 Reymundo Felipe appeals an adverse trial court judgment that denied his request to reopen a workers’ compensation claim for additional medical treatment. Felipe challenges a trial court jury instruction requiring him to support his aggravation claim with evidence of objective medical findings. Because the nature of Felipe’s injury excuses any requirement for objective findings and the court’s instruction prevented Felipe from arguing his theory of the case, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. As neither party has yet prevailed, we deny Felipe’s request for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Joyce v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Tollycraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pinney v. CarreraUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Ronald v. Ma'ae, V State Of Wa Dept Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Ada Motors, Inc., Dba Burien Toyota, Res. v. David L. Butler, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Imelda Magdaleno v. Walmart Stores & Department Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Lake Hills Investments Llc, App/cross-res. v. Ap Rushforth Constr. Co., Inc., Res/cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API