Legal Opinion

State v. Mastrilli

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 6, 1983No. 44601; CA A24858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of burglary. He assigns six errors on appeal. We find merit only in the last, which concerns the sentence imposed. The trial judge directed that, inter alia, the sentence be served consecutively “* * * to any time the defendant is [hereafter] ordered to serve as a result of parole violation in Montana if the defendant is returned to Montana before this sentence is served.” Imposing a sentence consecutive to an as yet unexecuted sentence is impermissible. See State v. DeChenne, 39 Or App 901, 594 P2d 831 (1979); State v. Ward, 59 Or App 42, 650 P2d 164 (1982).

The state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DeChenneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. State v. TrudeauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. MastrilliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API