Legal Opinion · Dissent

Candino v. Starpoint Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2014Published

1Dissent

Fahey and Whalen, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. In our view, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting claimant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon respondents, and we therefore would affirm the order.

“A notice of claim must be served within 90 days after the claim accrues, although a court may grant leave extending that time, provided that the application therefor is made before the expiration of the statute of limitations period of one year and 90 days (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; [5]). The decision whether to grant such leave…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. DALTON, II, DAVID H. v. AKRON CENTRAL SCHOOLSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Hubbard ex rel. Hubbard v. County of MadisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Wetzel Services Corp. v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API