Legal Opinion
Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Nix
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1932No. 29717PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.
Nix, the assured, recovered a judgment in the lower court against the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company, the insurer, for four hundred dollars. The recovery was had upon an insurance policy, issued by the insurer to the'assured, covering one Marmon car for six hundred dollars.
The policy contained the following provision: “This entire policy shall be void if the assured has concealed or misrepresented any material fact or circumstance concerning this insurance or the subject thereof; or in case of any fraud, attempted fraud, or false swearing by the assured touching any matter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. O'DomMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Germania Life Insurance v. BouldinMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Lay v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Highlands Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- World Insurance Company v. BetheaMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- American Alliance Ins. v. AlfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- F. B. Walker & Sons, Inc. v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Highlands Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.