Legal Opinion
Tyrolean Handbag Co. v. Empress Hand Bag, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction (1) restraining defendant from making and selling certain handbags upon the grounds that said handbags infringe plaintiff’s Letters Patent No. 2,606,588; and (2) restraining defendant from committing acts of unfair competition.
In support of the application plaintiff files two affidavits and submits various exhibits.
One Herman Slutsky, General Sales Manager of plaintiff, states that Letters Patent No. 2,606,588 were issued on August 12, 1952 to L. Kaufman and assigned by Kaufman to the plaintiff; that plaintiff has extensively…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawrence v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Simson Bros. v. Blancard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Stoody Co. v. Osage Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Nuclear-Chicago Corp. And Hal O. Anger v. Nuclear Data, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Jenn-Air Corporation v. Modern Maid CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Frommelt Industries, Inc. v. W. B. McGuire Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1981