Legal Opinion

Vetterly v. McNeal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by August Vetterly against James W. McNeal. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

This action was trespass quare clausum, begun in justice’s court, and certified to the circuit court upon plea of title, where the plaintiff prevailed, and the defendant has brought error; the judgment being based upon the verdict of a jury of $4.87 in plaintiff’s favor. The locus in quo is a governmental fractional subdivision of section 18, which lies contiguous to Lake Michigan, and, according to the plat, contains 56.70 acres. The accompanying drawing shows the situation. The plaintiff owns the land on section 19, lying south of it, and has for some years been in possession thereof. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. McAdamMichigan Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Triangle Land Co. v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Plank v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API