Legal Opinion

Armadeni v. Tejedo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1997No. 96-3149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to the date the appellant knew or should have known of the existence of the fraudulent concealment action, and thus summary judgment is precluded. See Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla.1976); Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France, 679 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993).

Reversed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Grossman v. GreenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale FranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valk v. JEM DISTRIBUTORS OF TAMPA BAYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997