Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Fuchs

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 26, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

I see no reason to change my former decision herein. (N. Y. L. J. Sept. 26, 1925.) The order of preference established by section 118 of the Surrogate’s Court Act (as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 574), subdivision 6, paragraph a, gives the public administrator a right superior to the persons mentioned in paragraph c of subdivision 6, and described therein as “ any other person or persons.” I cited in my former decision Matter of D’Adamo (212 N. Y. 214); Rocca v. Thompson (223 U. S. 317). The previous decision in Matter of Arbuckle (77 Misc. 309) was clearly overruled by these later…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rocca v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. In Re the Estate of D'AdamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. In re ArbuckleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KassamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API