Legal Opinion

Glemby Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 15, 1950No. 54328; protest 121918-K (New York)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This action involves the duty assessed by the collector upon 66 gross and 3)4 dozen artificial silk hair nets out of case numbered 30. The plaintiff claims that said hair nets were not landed in the United States. Although all of the regulations attending short shipment had been complied with, the collector was not satisfied that the alleged short-landed goods were not actually landed in the United States.

At the trial, Vincent J. Cerio, truck driver for the Package Express, Inc., testified on behalf of the plaintiff that he received case numbered 30 at the Baker & Williams…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abouchar & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Amity Silk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Charles Happel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API