Legal Opinion

Payne v. Hackney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1901No. Nos. 12,685—(32)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $320 paid to defendant on account of the purchase price of real estate, and interest, and $500 damages for defendant’s breach of his agreement to convey. The case was tried before O. B. Lewis, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $336.10. From an order denying a motion for judgment in his favor notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.2

This action was brought to recover damages for the failure on the part of defendant to- complete a contract for the sale of certain real estate. Plaintiff had a verdict in the court below, and defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

The facts are as follows: Defendant is engaged in the real-estate business in the city of St. Paul, buying and selling farm lands, and doing business under the firm name of L. S. Hackney Land Company, a copartnership consisting of himself and his brother, J. M. Hackney.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herrick v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larson v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Brown v. California & Western Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Doeren v. KrammerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Miller v. ShelburnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Smith v. GorsuchWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API