Legal Opinion · Dissent

State, Department of Transportation v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 9, 1970No. 39523Published

1DissentErvin, Chief Justice

In 1926, Respondent Railroad entered into a written agreement with the City of Miami which gave the City a thirty-year easement over a fifty-foot strip of property running from Northeast 6th to 9th Streets, immediately adjacent to the east boundary of the existing road or street now known as Biscayne Boulevard (U.S. Highway No. 1). The easement was given for the purpose of enabling the City to widen the existing roadway. The record facts before the trial court reveal the 1926 easement between Respondent Railroad and the City was never placed of public record.

In 1927 the City, in accord with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Downing v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Lovey v. Escambia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. State Road Department v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Bridgehead Land Co. Ex Rel. River's Edge, Inc. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API