Legal Opinion

Lemrick v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 1978No. 60317PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*716UHLENHOPP, Justice.

This appeal involves several legal problems which arose in connection with uninsured motorist coverages in two automobile insurance policies.

Barton and Laura Lemrick, spouses, were “named insureds” in a policy on their Oldsmobile car, issued by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company. Their son Paul Leroy Lemrick was an “insured” under that policy while occupying the Oldsmobile. Paul was also a “named insured” in a policy on his own Ford car, likewise issued by Grinnell Mutual. That policy covered him while occupying other cars, subject to certain provisions. Each policy…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  3. Franco v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re the Arbitration Between De Luca & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Lemars Mutual Insurance Co. v. JofferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Boyle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API