Legal Opinion

Arthur R. Soucy v. Dr. David Gilbertson, Et Ano

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 17, 2020No. 79927-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ARTHUR R. SOUCY, an individual, No. 79927-4-I Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. DR. DAVID GILBERTSON, an individual, UNPUBLISHED OPINION and MILLCREEK CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, Respondent. CHUN, J. — Dr. David Gilbertson provided chiropractic treatment for Arthur Soucy. After the treatment, Soucy suffered a stroke. He sued, alleging that Gilbertson performed a technique that caused dissection of his vertebral arteries, which in turn caused his stroke. At trial, Soucy requested a res ipsa loquitur jury instruction, which the trial court denied. The jury…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. ZeBarth v. Swedish Hospital Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API