Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Complaint of William Martz

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided November 3, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00152Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA In the Matter of the COMPLAINT of William Martz and Jane Martz, as owners of a Nautique vessel, for Case No. 3:20-cv-00152-SLG Limitation of Liability ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court at Docket 19 is Claimant Andrew Horazdovsky’s Motion for (1) Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint, (2) Vacating the Court’s June 30, 2020 Injunction, and (3) an Award of Reasonable Attorney Fees Incurred in Responding to the Complaint.1 Limitation Plaintiffs William Martz and Jane Martz responded in Opposition at Docket 23.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Eckstein Marine Service L.L.C. v. Lorne JacCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. In the Matter of the Complaint of McCarthy Brothers Company/clark Bridge, as Owner Pro Hac Vice of Barge No. Aeb1 for Exoneration From or Limitation of LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Doxsee Sea Clam Co., Inc. v. Christian BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API