Legal Opinion

Broga v. Seelye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the return was conclusive as to the facts embodied therein; but we do not pass upon the question whether the defendant may have relief by an action in equity. (Smith v. Lowry, 1 Johns. Ch. 320; Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N. Y. 156,165; Weimer v. Guinnane, 125 Misc. 681; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Dobson v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Smith v. LowryNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  4. Weimer v. Guinnane, New York County Courts1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East Syracuse Motor Car Co. v. TuttleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Van Orsdale v. Genesee Valley Garage, Inc., New York County Courts1934