Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Paige

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Heard on an agreed statement of facts, at tbe September Term, 1879, Dunton, J., presiding. The court decided that the trustees were chargeable. AGREED STATEMENT. The trustees are the executors of the estate of Sylvester F. Paige, deceased. The defendant is the son of said Sylvester F. (The provisions of the will are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.) The will has been duly proved.

Read the full summary

Heard on an agreed statement of facts, at tbe September Term, 1879, Dunton, J., presiding. The court decided that the trustees were chargeable. AGREED STATEMENT. The trustees are the executors of the estate of Sylvester F. Paige, deceased. The defendant is the son of said Sylvester F. (The provisions of the will are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.) The will has been duly proved. Alice Paige, named in the will, the wife of the defendant, is living, and she and said defendant have- one child living. There has been no order of distribution of said estate by the Probate Court,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, J.

The property in question has been attached by trustee process, by a creditor of Wilbur P. Paige, the principal *378debtor ; and the question is submitted, whether it be subject to such attachment.

Wilbur F. Paige derives his title to the property by the will of his father, which is expressed in the following words :

“ I give, &c., to my son Wilbur F. Paige, one equal undivided half of all the residue of my estate, both real and personal. To have and to hold to him the said Wilbur F. Paige, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Ide v. IdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Hibbard v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  4. Lawton v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Williamson v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stowell v. HastingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  2. McCloskey v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  3. In Re Carter's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  4. In re Irish's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  5. Chaplin v. HelenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API