Pickron v. Garrett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The demurrer of the Garretts, the two defendants who did not reside in Eandolph County, to the petition of the plaintiff, presents the contention that the essential allegations constitute an action in trover, and that the case as made by the petition sounded in trover and not in trespass. While some of the allegations sound much like-an action in trover, and the question raised by the demurrer is. not free of all doubt, we think that the court correctly construed the action as being in trespass, and properly overruled the demurrer. Even if the petition be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kuck v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Milltown Lumber Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Warren v. RushingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Burns v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Anthony v. AnthonySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klingshirn v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Henderson v. EastersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Esab Distributors Southeast, Inc. v. Flamex Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- O'Neill v. Western Mortgage Corporation of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Southern Discount Co. v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.