Federal Land Bank v. Joynes
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentSpratley, J.
Mr. Justice Hudgins and I are unable to concur in the disposition of this appeal in view of what we consider to be the controlling facts of the controversy.
Subrogation, purely a creature of equity, is peculiarly dependent upon the facts and circumstances of each particular case. The record contains material and pertinent facts not mentioned, and apparently not considered, in the majority opinion.
In 1915, Mrs. Joynes, by the conveyance to her sons of her one-third share in the 87 acre tract, paid full value for the $700 annuity secured to her by a vendor’s Hen on that entire tract.
Thomas E.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Obici v. FurcronSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Kelly v. Bank of Mount HopeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Price v. LovinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936