Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Luckenbach

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 14, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGarey, S.

While this court had under consideration a motion to reject the referee’s report on the -issues raised- in the contested compulsory accounting of the sole acting trustee and income beneficiary of the trust created by the decedent’s will, such trustee and income beneficiary died, thereby terminating the trust. The court was, therefore, unable to render its decision pending the probate of the deceased trustee’s will. The will has now been admitted to probate and the executor of that estate has been made, by order, a party to the accounting.

*267The application for the compulsory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. . HodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Mossein v. Empire State Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. In re the Estate of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ArkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. In re the Estate of BehnckeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API