Legal Opinion
Kagan v. Garfinkle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 13, 1975No. 74-1254PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
312 So.2d 778 (1975)
Lawrence KAGAN, Appellant,
v.
Howard GARFINKLE et al., Appellees.
No. 74-1254.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 13, 1975.
A. Jay Cristol and Steven Mishan, Miami, for appellant.
Brickman, Male & Bloom and Stephen A. Freeman, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
PEARSON, Judge.
The appellant, Lawrence Kagan, as plaintiff in an amended complaint for damages, sought to recover a portion of a real estate commission. Though Kagan is a real estate broker in the State of New York, he is not licensed in the State of Florida. The trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pokress v. Tisch Florida Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Rudman v. BaineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lucas v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Tassy v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Mary M. Lucas, of the Estate of Robert F. Lucas, and Cross-Appellee v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., a Corporation and Amax, Inc., a Corporation v. Noranda Mines, Limited, a Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Phoenix Asset Management LLC v. GCCFC 2005-GG5 Route 33 Industrial, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.