Legal Opinion

Angelucci v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

“A party seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 must demonstrate the merits of the case, a reasonable excuse for the delay, the absence of an[y] intent to abandon the matter and the lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party” (Rivers v Jamaica Water Supply Co., 250 AD2d 661 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Moreover, all of the above requirements must be satisfied before a case can be properly restored (see Fico v Health Ins. Plan of Greater N.Y., 248 AD2d 432).

The plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to restoration of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fico v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rivers v. Jamaica Water Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sarot v. YusufovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API