Legal Opinion

Boutin v. Lindsley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Ashland County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

The complaint of the plaintiffs, as copartners, against the defendants, as copartners, states, in effect, the following facts: The defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $218 for services performed at their special instance and request in towing and working upon certain pine saw logs, between May 1 and June 16, 1891, said labor consisting in towing 545,000 feet of said logs *645from Madeline Island to the city of Ashland, at eighteen cents per 1,000 feet, the price agreed upon, and in holding onto and waiting for a raft of logs at Madeline Island for the space of forty-eight…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisk v. TankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Ives & M'Carty v. Van Epps & ShattuckNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Taylor v. ReadNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  4. Eastman v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Emery v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. AndrusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Widman v. GayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Prautsch v. RasmussenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. National Knitting Co. v. Bouton & Germain Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API