Boutin v. Lindsley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Ashland County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
The complaint of the plaintiffs, as copartners, against the defendants, as copartners, states, in effect, the following facts: The defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $218 for services performed at their special instance and request in towing and working upon certain pine saw logs, between May 1 and June 16, 1891, said labor consisting in towing 545,000 feet of said logs *645from Madeline Island to the city of Ashland, at eighteen cents per 1,000 feet, the price agreed upon, and in holding onto and waiting for a raft of logs at Madeline Island for the space of forty-eight…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fisk v. TankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Ives & M'Carty v. Van Epps & ShattuckNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Taylor v. ReadNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Eastman v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Emery v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schultz v. AndrusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Widman v. GayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Prautsch v. RasmussenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- National Knitting Co. v. Bouton & Germain Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909