Legal Opinion
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Moynihan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 31, 1930No. 3746PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS and PAGE, Circuit Judges, and WILKERS ON, District Judge.
The bill in this case, filed September 20, 1923, seeks to enjoin, on grounds of confiscation, rates for telephone service prescribed in an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission made on August 16, 1923, and effective October 1, 1923.
The rates now charged are those fixed by the Public Utilities Commission (the predecessor of the Commerce Commission) by order of December 20, 1920. The Commerce Commission instituted proceedings against the plaintiff on September 13, 1921, and by the order here attacked reduced the rates for four…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, United Telephone System, Inc., Intervenors. People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Communications Company, Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Intervenors. Lexitel Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, United Telephone Systems, Inc., Intervenors. Western Union Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Intervenors. North American Telephone Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Sprint Communications Corporation, Intervenors. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Service Corporation, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Sprint Communications Corporation, Intervenors. Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Western Union Telegraph Company, Intervenors. United States Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Gte Sprint Communications Corporation, Intervenors. Telesphere Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting Companies, Intervenors. Association of Long Distance Telephone Companies v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Western Union Telegraph Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1932
- United States v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. GilbertDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.