Legal Opinion

Cone v. Cone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 21, 1995No. 94-0667Published

1Per curiam

In this appeal the appellant challenges the amount of attorney’s fees awarded as inadequate. The fees were awarded pursuant to a marital property settlement agreement which provides for fees, costs and expenses incurred for its enforcement.

This case is governed by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145, 1151 (Fla.1985), modified, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla.1990), wherein our supreme court set forth the applicable lodestar methodology for the determination of attorney’s fees. Under this methodology, the number of hours reasonably…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Allison v. AllisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API