Legal Opinion
ADAMS v. MERCK & CO., INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 11, 2022No. 2:20-cv-05756Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE : MDL NO. 2848 LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY : LITIGATION : _____________________________ : : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : : CAROLYN ADAMS v. MERCK & CO., : CIVIL ACTION No. 20-5756 INC. et al. : _____________________________ : ___________________________ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 446 Bartle, J. August 11, 2022 Before the court is the motion of defendants Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (collectively “Merck”) to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Carolyn…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re Guidant Corp. Implantable DefibrillatorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In re Diet DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002