Legal Opinion

Hage Et Ux v. Harvey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract made between the plaintiff-appellants and defendant-respondent Harvey. From an adverse decree the plaintiffs appeal.

The defendant Salem Title Company by a cross-complaint interpleaded and tendered into court the $10,000 later referred to as a deposit in escrow and prayed for a decree respecting the ownership of the fund as between the plaintiffs and the defendant Harvey.

On the twenty-ninth day of May, 1953, the plaintiffs for a consideration of $100 executed and delivered to the defendant Harvey an instrument giving bim an option for one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Welch v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario & German American Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Toomey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hinton v. RoethlerOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. Curry County BankOregon Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Wall v. SEC Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Roadway Express, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Wilfred E. Jossy, William O. Jossy and Roberta TichenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Coleman v. Parry Center for ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API