Legal Opinion

Lopes v. Brito

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal prom Judd, C.J., in Chambers.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Preston, J.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Chief Justice sitting in Chambers as the Intermediary Court for the Island of Oahu.

The facts of the case and the arguments of counsel are sufficiently set out in the decision appealed from.

On a consideration of such decision and of the facts, we are of opinion that the Chief Justice was correct in holding that the transaction between these parties was not a bailment, but a contract for the breach of which an action of assumpsit will lie. The decision appealed from is therefore affirmed with costs.

*680Decision of Chief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Pattison v. . Syracuse National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Smith v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Buffum v. MerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1824
  5. Pitlock v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ChingHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. KossmanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Kane v. Island Leasing LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API