Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Foster

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Steele county; Fisk, J. Action by John Murphy and James Murphy against John C. Foster. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

Action upon a promissory note given for the purchase price of one Monarch self-feeder. Defendant alleged that the self-feeder was purchased under a warranty, that there was a breach of such warranty, that the machine was returned to plaintiff in pursuance of the terms of the warranty, and that the contract was thereby rescinded. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant. Judgment was rendered on the verdict, and plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment.

The errors relied on for a reversal of the judgment are that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanford v. Duluth & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Schomberg v. LongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Long v. RexfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolf v. GrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API