Legal Opinion

Gold v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Term affirming judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, reversed on the law, with costs, judgment of the City Court reversed on the law, with costs, and motion for summary judgment denied, with *644ten dollars costs and disbursements. The appeal from the summary judgment was reviewable by the Appellate Term. (Donnelly v. Bauder, 217 App. Div. 59; Endicott Johnson Corporation v. Foldesy, 248 N. Y. 655.) Plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment. There are issues of fact to be tried. (Britton v. Marks, 105 App. Div. 85.) The Statute of Frauds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Donnelly v. BauderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Britton v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Endicott Johnson Corporation v. FoldesyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API