Moore v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNELIUS, Commissioner.
Appellant and his co-defendant Darnell Robbins, though indicted separately, were tried jointly for rape. This appeal is by appellant Willie Edward Moore only. He was convicted, and his punishment was assessed by the jury at life. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
In the first ground of error appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his first motion for a continuance which was filed on the day of trial. The motion alleged that appellant had not been able to locate three inportant fact witnesses known to him only as females named…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Palasota v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McMahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Cabello v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Anthony Hurst v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Gilbert Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Gilbert Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.